20/12/2018 – News / Sustainability / Business / Emissions / EU / CO2 / Carbon
EU system for curbing emissions has not dented firms’ profitability, finds new OECD report
Can we reduce emissions without hurting jobs or a company's financial performance? Yes, says the OECD, whose new report shows that companies subjected to the EU cap-and-trade scheme actually performed better over the nine-year period under study.
The global policy organisation’s new report finds that emissions curbs set by the European Union’s Emissions Trading System – Europe’s main tool for reducing carbon emissions – have not hurt revenue, profits or employment at firms subject to the cap-and-trade programme over the 2005-2014 period. On the contrary, the new study suggests the programme – the world’s first international emissions trading scheme – may have actually played a role in boosting the performance metrics for participating companies.
The new report – ‘The joint Impact of the EU ETS on Carbon Emissions and Economic Performance – compares financial data from around 2,000 firms operating ETS-regulated facilities across the EU with data from similar-sized, unregulated firms from the same countries and sectors. It finds that ETS regulations had no negative effect on revenue, profits, fixed assets or jobs. In fact, the report found that firms subject to the cap-and-trade programme actually tended to perform better.
Reducing emissions, boosting productivity
Revenues of firms subject to the ETS were 7– 18-per-cent higher at the end of the period studied than what they would have been without the EU ETS, and their fixed assets grew by 6–10 per cent compared to ‘control’ firms in the study.
Employment levels and operating profit at ETS firms were also higher than at non-ETS firms, although by a non-statistically significant amount. Previous evidence has shown that the EU ETS encourages regulated companies to invest in carbon-saving technology, which can boost productivity.
No sector or country experienced negative effect
In further evidence the ETS does not hurt the competitiveness of European industry with respect to regions with less stringent regulation of emissions, a breakdown of firm-level financial results shows that no single sector or country – irrespective of its dependence on carbon emissions – has experienced a negative effect from the EU ETS.
Dramatically driving down CO2
The report also finds the ETS has been effective in reducing carbon emissions. In fact, a significant difference was observed when emissions data from power plants and industrial facilities covered by the ETS was compared with data from similar but unregulated facilities in the four countries where data enabled such a comparison (France, the Netherlands, Norway and the UK).
ETS-regulated plants in those countries cut their emissions by 10-14 per cent between the system’s 2005 introduction and 2012, compared with similar-sized unregulated installations from the same countries and sectors. Most of the drop took place during the second trading phase of the ETS (2008–2012), and the decrease was most marked at the biggest facilities.
The EU ETS is the world’s first international emissions trading system and the biggest of 25 carbon cap-and-trade systems in place worldwide today. It allocates tradeable emissions permits to over 14,000 power stations and industrial plants in 31 countries accounting for over 40 per cent of the EU’s total greenhouse gas emissions.
To watch the OECD’s presentation on the subject, or to download the full report, visit: http://www.oecd.org/economy/greeneco/can-we-reduce-emissions-without-hurting-jobs/
Latest issue – Vol 1/23
– Mining & Minerals focus
– IMARC post-event report
– Responsibly resourcing - Future Minerals Forum pre-event report
Mines and Money Connect London 2023
Petrochemical and Refining Congress: Europe 2023
Abu Dhabi, UAE